{
  "A": {
    "accuracy": 6,
    "completeness": 5,
    "code_quality": 6,
    "clarity": 6,
    "efficiency": 8,
    "rationale": "Minimal but too vague. Phases lack specificity (e.g., no mention of graceful degradation, sync/async, or response model). Meets format but barely."
  },
  "B": {
    "accuracy": 8,
    "completeness": 9,
    "code_quality": 8,
    "clarity": 8,
    "efficiency": 6,
    "rationale": "Strong context with concrete assumptions (app.state.db, AsyncSession, router pattern). Phases are detailed and actionable. Some bullets exceed 15 words and adds speculative details (prefix '/api/health') not in spec. Slightly verbose."
  },
  "C": {
    "accuracy": 9,
    "completeness": 9,
    "code_quality": 9,
    "clarity": 9,
    "efficiency": 8,
    "rationale": "Best balance: graceful degradation explicitly called out, sync/async consideration, unauthenticated note, static checks in verification. All bullets concise. Slightly generic on DB helper but appropriately so without seeing actual code."
  },
  "ranking": [
    "C",
    "B",
    "A"
  ],
  "claude_code_equivalent": "true"
}